The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050
The line graph illustrates the proportion of the population in New Zealand population, which varies according to age group from 1950 to 2050.
Overall, while the ratio of people aged 0-14 and 38-45 showed an upward trend, a reverse pattern can be seen of the counterpart of people aged 25-37 and over 65.
In 1950, the percentage of people aged from 38 to 45 years old dominated the most among all the factors surveyed, at 25%, which was five times as much as that of 0-14-year-old people. After 40 years, the former witnessed a significant increase to roughly a half; meanwhile, the latter had a slight dip to 4%. After that, this experienced a modest fall in 2000. As it is seen in the graph, it is envisaged to hit the plateau at 40% in the remaining surveyed period, whereas the opposite rose steeply and is set to account for 20% by 2050.
By contrast, in the year 1950, the proportion of people aged over 65 is going to dominate at 60%, which is far exceeding than that of people aged 25-37 (20%). Both figures will then experience a fluctuating trend and are anticipated to hit rock bottom at 55% and 2% respectively at the end of the survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-04 | necromancer2610 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | kieutrangkg1 | 84 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 82
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government pays some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50717703349 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61588184885 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622009569378 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7441527846 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208241422428 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894636652209 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14951958973 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159255572409 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1848361417 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.