The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, mobile Phones and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK.
The line chart represents the percentage of the use of computers, mobile phones, CDs, the internet and DVDs in the UK for a period between 1997 and 2001.
In 1997, 60% of DVDs used in the UK, and this figure fell before rising <wdautohl-customtag style="font-weight:bold;color:red;font-size:inherit;display:inline;" id="wdautohl_id_8" class="wdautohl_c3RlZXBseQ__">steeply</wdautohl-customtag> to reach a peak of approximately 80% in 1998. From then on, however, it decreased significantly to a level of about 10% in 2001.
The percentage of CD users were 50% in the UK in 1997 which means that the growth in this category was constant over the period. However, mobile phones were used in 1997, in the UK with the beginning at 40%, and this figure climbed <wdautohl-customtag style="font-weight:bold;color:red;font-size:inherit;display:inline;" id="wdautohl_id_9" class="wdautohl_c3dpZnRseQ__">swiftly</wdautohl-customtag> progressing in the next 5 years and <wdautohl-customtag style="font-weight:bold;color:red;font-size:inherit;display:inline;" id="wdautohl_id_10" class="wdautohl_dHJhdmVyc2U_">traversed</wdautohl-customtag> to 80% by 2001. On the other hand, using computers accounted for 20% in 1997, although this category also <wdautohl-customtag style="font-weight:bold;color:red;font-size:inherit;display:inline;" id="wdautohl_id_11" class="wdautohl_aW5jcmVtZW50ZWQ_">incremented</wdautohl-customtag> dramatically, rising from about 20% to around 90% during the period. In contrast, the proportion of the usage of the internet was 10% in 1997. In comparison with it gradually increased and reached 40% in 2001.
Overall, Most of the users choice computer rather than other technological <wdautohl-customtag style="font-weight:bold;color:red;font-size:inherit;display:inline;" id="wdautohl_id_12" class="wdautohl_Z2FkZ2V0">gadgets</wdautohl-customtag>. This category experienced a sharp growth from 1997 to 2001, whereas there was a continuing upward trend in the using of other devices expect CDs and DVDs.
- The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, mobile Phones and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK. 73
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach art subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment.To w 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, mobile Phones and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of the uses of five modern technological devices (CD, DVD, Computers, mobile Phones and internet) from 1997 to 2001 in the UK. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for a period between 1997 and 2001. In 1997, 60% of DVDs used in the UK, and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly to a level of about 10% in 2001. The percentage of CD users were 50% in t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...age of the internet was 10% in 1997. In comparison with it gradually increased and reached...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y increased and reached 40% in 2001. Overall, Most of the users choice comput...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 965.302439024 202% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 8.42857142857 4.92477711251 171% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 14.7177960047 2.65546596893 554% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.45097560976 145% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 149.331979161 43.030603864 347% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.7 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113717617905 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974304150053 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905335461588 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138018986419 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115028806561 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.8 13.2329268293 225% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 5.83 61.2550243902 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 10.3012195122 177% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 31.91 11.4140731707 280% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.