The line graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China, Japan and the United States. (Value is calculated in term of Australian dollars - billions)
The line graphs illustrate Australia trade with three different countries, which is calculated in Australian dollars.
Overall, it is noticeable that while the value of trade with Japan and China experienced fluctuations during the period shown, the value of exports and imports to and from USA remained relatively stable.
In 2004, imports from Japan was valued at about 18 billion dollars, rising to reach a peak of 40 billion dollars, before falling to about 31 billion dollars at the end of the period shown. By contrast, exports value to Japan significantly fluctuated between 10 and 14 billion dollars from 2004 to 2009.
In contrast, the value of exports to USA was considerably higher than imports value to that country. Over the period from 2004 to 2009, while exports to USA was valued at around 30 billion dollars, imports value from USA remained relatively stable at 10 billion dollars.
The value of exports and imports to and from China in 2004 were estimated at 11 and 20 billion dollars respectively. In 2009, the imports trade saw an dramatic increase to 40 billion dollars, overtaking the value of exports to that country, which was only estimated at 31 billion dollars
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over 4 seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 word 57
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below You should write at least 150 words You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 61
- The line graphs below show the value of Australian trading with China Japan and the United States Value is calculated in term of Australian dollars billions 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...SA remained relatively stable. In 2004, imports from Japan was valued at about 1...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ctively. In 2009, the imports trade saw an dramatic increase to 40 billion dollars...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0303030303 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64758246113 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3143320321 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310575453402 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172144223442 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454151842162 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204095423912 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386181155932 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.