the literacy rates in various countries
The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female who are literate in six countries, namely Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Egypt, Kuwait, and Pakistan between 1990 and 2000. It can be seen in the chart that the literacy rates in both men and women increased after ten years. However, the rates of knowledge female in Bangladesh, Egypt, and Pakistan are still lower than that in the rest countries.
In Brazil, the proportion of literacy of men and women was about 80% in 1990, then both rose by nearly 9% in 2000. On the other hand, that of Chinese men was the highest in comparison with other countries but only grew by 4% from just under 90%. Nevertheless, the rate of literacy Chinese women in 1990 was 70% and increased to about 80% during the period.
The percentage of literacy female in Pakistan was the lowest (20%), almost similar to that percentage in Bangladesh. There is also a dramatic difference between the percentage of knowledge men and that of women in Egypt, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, about three times higher than the rate of women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | luvberry | 91 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | Dida18 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Садуш Йулдашева | view | |
| 2019-12-10 | Ramishatahir | 59 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | Ramishatahir | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the literacy rates of various countries in 1990 and 2000. 56
- The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
- Visitors to two music sites on the web. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77595628415 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53055619431 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4519466523 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181313020339 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865210377835 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527978419354 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124236623579 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287731769765 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.