Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrates the change of Sunnyhills University campus between 1995 and today.
Overall, there are more places for students to entertain today.
In the past, the founder’s building was between students’union and scott library. Not only that, the founders building was also between the Watson building and the Cafe. The main reception was in front of the Watson building, while the halls of residence was in front of the Watson building. The big area which was including the football pitch, the tennis courts and the gym was in the bottom right-hand corner of the campus. There were two car parks on the campus. One of them was in front of the bus stop, while the other was in front of the Cafe.
These days, the campus changes a lot. The big area which was in the bottom right-hand corner of the campus is replaced by recreation area and the pond. There are two halls of residence and two coffe shops instead of one for each in the past. In the oppiste, there is only one car park. Not only that, there aren’t the football pitch and tennis courts. However, there are the table tennis tables on the right side and the art building in behind the Watson building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 78
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1955 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the stages in the life cycle of a dragonfly Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68095238095 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34235863841 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447619047619 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4144383539 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2142857143 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114535245279 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051995282483 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896201844781 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124058645587 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131446886487 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.