The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Given are two maps contrasting the modifications of an island over a course of time to serve region’s visitors.
Perceptibly, the area has been developed into a well-facilities tourist destination with the addition of various amenities without replacing its original nature landscape.
In terms of the former area, it was a pristine island with some trees in the west and the east of the region. Additionally, there was a beach to the left-hand side which used to be abandoned.
After a significant renovation, the given region became very attractive with the island's tourists. It is noticeable that ten accommodations have been built in the heart of the island, and six others located in further west of the paradise island, to the right-hand of the beach, which is used for swimming. Each bungalow is connected with each other by footpath, and visitors could go to the beach from cottages by the same way. In the middle of two groups of accommodations, a reception has been constructed, which is surrounded by vehicle track leading to the restaurant in the north and a pier for sailing in the south of the island.
- The diagram below shows the stages in the life cycle of a dragonfly Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9417989418 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04385055071 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3867909539 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108743993054 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474905234959 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361695918204 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689076561258 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318907593335 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.