It is a disputable issue whether media coverage of celebrities is harming children. Important though celebrity reports may be a bad case, learns about celebrities also could provide live textbooks to self-examination. All things considered, I do not fully agree with this opinion.
Admittedly, Children's nature makes them imitate others' behaviors and that in fact may lead them to be misled, which is would a negative effect on their growth. Concretely speaking, they are too young to distinguish right from wrong. The core of the problem is the weakness of judgment.
To begin with, the development of judgment requires experience as a basis. To some extent, the hand-on coverage from celebrities is the most vivid case. Parents with long-term vision will not keep their children in the greenhouse forever. On the contrary, they are good at educating children with real cases, which including negative cases of necessity.
In addition，familiar with celebrity’s story are beneficial to independence. We should know that it would have taken a paragon of virtue not to fall into temptation. If children could realize that the world is complex and sophisticated, individuals will always encounter numerous temptations. They will not be too naive and stand behind their parents all the time. By keeping in touch with the truth, they are more likely to deal with various things in the real world.
As the motto says, the way up and the way down is the same, depending on how you act, despite exposure to some negative reports is a kind of risk to children, the positive parts are more dominant. By doing so, not only would it help them distinguish right from wrong but also conducive to independence.
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- TPO 37 Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 76
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die Some people suggest that th 83
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, in addition, in fact, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12142857143 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96351969448 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2532423082 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3529411765 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265181508997 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751232273856 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649228871419 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133865757193 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717658645178 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.