Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Fecebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society .
To what extent do you agree?
In our progressive life, a wide range of social networking sites, including Facebook, are accessible for almost everyone. However, most of the world's population think that easy-contact internet sites have had a negative influence on individuals and society.
Social medias have had a beneficiary impact on business, education and social life. Firstly, communication sites allow business related people in different countries to interact without even face-to-face meetings. Secondly, websites, like Zoom, give new opportunities for relationships between students and teachers. For instance, a pupil can take video lessons with a teacher despite the distances between them. Finally, many people utilize public sites for being aware of last news regarding the policy, science or fashion life. That is enough to check personal profiles daily for awareness of recent reports.
On the one hand, many people these days care too much about their persona, and how many likes they receive. Young people, rather than mixing with their peers, seeking " virtual" friendships. Teenagers and at the same time adults value themselves by online followers. Experts insist that posting pictures (in sites like Facebook, Instagram) of daily funs, such as vacations, parties and material values, forces people of lower backgrounds to reduce self-esteem. On the other hand, the availability of modern communication technologies has the result of isolating people from real life. Inhabitants do not have to put efforts to offer them to buy abroad tickets for visiting their friends and relatives. Due to this, bonds among human beings become weaker.
In conclusion, I believe that social networking sites have had a bad impact in our life but they also can be useful and helpful, if we do not overuse them and overestimate their capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-22 | dinarochka | 89 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Fecebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 89
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of seaville in 1980 and 2010 61
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 61
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...r almost everyone. However, most of the worlds population think that easy-contact inte...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...influence on individuals and society. Social medias have had a beneficiary imp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...daily for awareness of recent reports. On the one hand, many people these days ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onds among human beings become weaker. In conclusion, I believe that social net...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49290780142 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8647237249 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 106.607317073 184% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695035460993 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 283.868780488 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3773087755 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24000753649 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653758363549 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704238549307 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153781384122 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441430362071 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 40.7170731707 238% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.