the map below gives information about a school in 2004
The drawing illustrates the development of the school over a period of 6 years from 2004.
In 2004, there were 600 pupils attending the school, and only a school building was connected to the sports field by walking path. To the south of the Sports field, there was a main road which led to Car park in the west.
Six years later, two additional school buildings were erected in the right and the bottom of the first school building, leading to the number of pupils increased by 400 individuals. In addition, the sports field was reconstructed to smaller and the walking path was also relocated to connect three school building. Finally, the infrastructure of the school was also developed with adding a new car park built to the east of the original school building.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of change in 2010 involved the addition of two new school buildings. Therefore the school was able to accommodate a considerably larger number of students.
- the pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduate and postgraduate 78
- line chart 11
- Some people think that governments should change the way individuals live, while others believe they should choose the way themselves. Discuss these both points of view and give your opinion? 89
- Essay topics: The table shows the number of miles of passengers traveled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005. It also shows a projection of the year 2015 61
- Some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e addition of two new school buildings. Therefore the school was able to accommodate a co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88554216867 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71055554027 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5550220913 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165295638703 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084293432381 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491213200022 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115324953088 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020423158621 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.