The map below shows the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates a considerable change of Islip town from now to planned development.
It is obvious that a Dual carriageway append in new plan which make people have a very good access to different facilities. The size of park decreases because of the Dual carriageway.
As can be seen the countryside and shops which located above the main road remove in new plan of Islip town. The bus station, shopping center, and car park located the north of main road that its name changed to pedestrians only in development plan. There are two new housing both side of shops that which one located in northern has a separate access road and southern located close to park. The two-housing relocated below the dual carriageway and next to the new housing. Finaly the school don’t change in the planned development
As a result, there are lots of facilities in new Islip map and looks it is better than its old version.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online whitout paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with prediction for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'very good access'.
Suggestion: very good access
...pend in new plan which make people have a very good access to different facilities. The size of pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... don’t change in the planned development As a result, there are lots of facilitie...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66176633084 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4729368296 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190593060951 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885571856694 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706233199916 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121399100495 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057875167811 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.