The map below show a book store in 2000 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate a book store's different structures in 2000 and now.
In general, it can be seen that the book store has organised differently to adopt the new trend of combination of book and coffee shop.
Particularly, the fiction area in the left of the book store, counted from the entrance in 2000 has been divided into four categories, art, hobbies, cookery and fiction at the present. Also, the fiction area next to that line changed into non-fiction. Directly from the entrance, there used to be three sections including art, hobbies, cookery, but now, there are only three coffee tables. The tables are placed nearly at the centre of the book store, which is convenient for the bookworms to sit down and enjoy the books. Opposite to those tables, a coffee bar is also installed instead of the non fiction section.
Despite the change mentioned above, there still some remains the same. For example, the service desk still places at the right corner next to the entrance, just like in 2000, whereas the line of the new books, which is near the service desk, is just behind the entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. 73
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 87
- In many parts of the world people search for family history Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and show your opin 76
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80104712042 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39265297232 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586387434555 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1987119696 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131396576389 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624140734397 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078317667908 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112888525273 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896505701152 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.