The two maps indicate the the differences between the layouts of the village of Stokeford in the year 1930 and 2010.It can be clearly seen that the main change involves the addition of houses and the retirement home. As a result, the population of the village was dramatically bigger.
Now turning to the details. By the year 1930, there were two farmlands in the South West and the North East of the village respectively. For the year 2010, the two farmlands were demolished to make way for more houses along the main road. In the year 1930, there was large house surrounded by gardens to the South of the primary school. 80 years later, it was flattened to erect a retirement home on this site.Furthermore, during this period, the post office, the bridge, and the river Stoke remained unchanged after 80 years. The primary school was expaned which means that there was more pupils attending.
In summary, the village of Sokeford has changed dramatically from year 1930 to 2010.
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 78
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions 67
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions 67
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The two maps indicate the the differences between the layouts of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The two maps indicate the the differences between the layouts of the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74705882353 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45006178864 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8497362114 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106346888611 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440346733909 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614477642978 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785872379813 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705340961617 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.