the map below shows the changes to Lakeside Holiday Park following its development in 2014
The map illustrates the alterations to Lakeside Holiday Park after its development in 2014. Overall, there were more public services available in the area.
As can be seen from the map, to the left of the park, an office was constructed before 2014, later, on its right side, a playground appeared. Contemporarily with the playground, an Aquarius drive was built, which covered three sides of the park, except for the east one. On the northerly- easterly side of the map, three new cabins were established, whose proximity to six aligned cabins built before 2014 lying along the coast. In the same direction, crossing the mirror lake and the swimming area, was there a pier constructed in 2014. It is interesting that the laundry locating between two braches of the Aquarius drive was abandoned and replaced by a new one on the southerly side of the cabins. With regard to the south of the map, there witnessed the construction of an area for picnic along walking tracks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-26 | chimdaivotan | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different agegroups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons where relevant. 78
- Immigration in UK 67
- Topic The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 92
- Immigration in UK 42
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...public services available in the area. As can be seen from the map, to the lef...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, except for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88554216867 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68556487042 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4640171466 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214344548437 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108541739625 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157104189161 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235123664637 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115464044868 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.