The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. Write a report based on the map.
The map highlights the modification that occurs in a village, comparing the 1995 and now.
Overall, it is clear that the striking development is the conversion of farmland and forest park into golf and tennis. In addition, the fish market and the fishing port have been demolished to make way for the apartment.
In the north-west corner, more houses have been constructed on the side of the street, and directly below this is a new path widened to the west. The fish market, which was situated originally near the coast of the sea, is now replaced by the apartments. There was a fishing port lying in front of the market; however, it has been knocked down by now. The restaurant to the opposite side of the road has been established in place of the shop.
In the north-east area, the farmland and forest park were knocked into one, and the sport area for golf and tennis was erected in this place. Meanwhile, to the south of the sport center is the hotel and cafe, which were left unchanged. However, at present, a new car park is added next to the hotel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-10 | damasi | view | |
| 2020-07-15 | emmaphamngoc | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-15 | emmaphamngoc | 11 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Write a report based on the map 67
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Write a report based on the map 11
- Topic The chart shows the waste disposal in one European country in four years 2005 2006 2007 and 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5497382199 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47890140322 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5720173087 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0642073777311 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279490611353 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481141566992 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561423586026 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612427278752 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.