The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present

The maps illustrate how the village called Ryemouth changed from 1995 up to present.

It is clear that the village has developed hurriedly between 1995 and now. The initial impression from the maps is the disappearance of vast green space as well as the fishing port. In addition, the village’s infrastructure has been renovated while introducing some extra facilities including housing, recreation and dining.

Looking at the 1995 map, there were a large farmland and a forest park located in the north eastern region of the village. However, they were completely destroyed to give way for a spacious golf course as well as two tennis courts at the moment. Going along the road to the south, there is a hotel and a café which have remained unchanged since 1995 while they erected a band new car park at the right side of the hotel.

Furthermore, the modification of housing amenity is also a considerable point when talking about the Ryemouth over this period. In the north, two housing rows besides the main road, have been spreaded with the appearance of two fresh ones. A new roadway has been added passing the housing square area and in that route, two houses have been constructed. The south west part of the village witnesses a rapidly development, too. The shops and fishing market have been replaced by restaurants and apartments corresponding.

Finally, the fishing port no longer exists in Ryemouth now.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the village has developed hurriedly between 1995 and now. The initial impres...
^^
Line 8, column 400, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('development') instead of another adjective.
...outh west part of the village witnesses a rapidly development, too. The shops and fishing market have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, talking about, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01680672269 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71254204211 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613445378151 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6263992556 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8461538462 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222930249403 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837589549705 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113125457709 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144251241256 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116257362159 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.