The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The maps given illustrates the expansion of the Ryemouth village. Overall, the village has changed dramatically since 1995, with the disappearance of the fishing port and the update of infrastructures and housing systems along with some new entertainment.

On the map from 1995, the village north-east was home to a large farmland and a forest park. However, they were entirely replaced with new tennis courts and a huge golf yard. Looking to the southeast side of the village, it is clear that the hotel and the coffee remain intact while a brand new car park was built next to the hotel.

During that period, the housing systems were also improved with a new road heading to the west of the town and two house along with the road. Although the northwest of the town did not saw any reconstruction or replacement, the southern part met heavy modifications. First, the fishing industry were completely destroyed, with the deconstruction of the fishing port and a apartment system replacing the fish market in its location. Second, the old shops from 1995 were modified into modern restaurant

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'house' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'houses'.
Suggestion: houses
...heading to the west of the town and two house along with the road. Although the north...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... deconstruction of the fishing port and a apartment system replacing the fish mar...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01092896175 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84158259724 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.891191648 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0655652411227 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344366515824 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440941523528 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543583201817 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348306065925 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.