The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates, the availability of place for two supermarket in the city of Garlsdon. Overall, population of the city was 65,000 and majority of them lived in either side of the city center and most of the town has industry than housing.
Initially, the first supermarket was planned to built in countryside near to industrial area and there were a main road coming from north west area which is pass through the left side of allocated area to south east of Garlsdon. Similarly the other side of supermarket has railway as well which is figured as 12 km to Hindon and population consist of 10,000.
The other supermarket place was on city center which is absent of traffic zone, whereas, main road was passing near to the planned area which is covered by industry. From this plot only 25 km to crandson with population count was 29,000. Moreover, supermarket two was near to Brandson such as mere 16km with population was 15,000. Railway line pass through the second supermarket from east to west.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'supermarket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'supermarkets'.
Suggestion: supermarkets
...ates, the availability of place for two supermarket in the city of Garlsdon. Overall, popul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the town has industry than housing. Initially, the first supermarket was pla...
^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...located area to south east of Garlsdon. Similarly the other side of supermarket has railw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63017541199 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4411071032 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140544154302 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733870856693 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578317792114 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105509076692 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025003943492 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.