Maps
The maps illustrate some changes that were made in Youngsville in New Zealand from 1980 to 2005 for over 25 years.
It is clear that most trees and houses were transformed into infrastructures in 2005. And in the west of the map in 1980, 4 places were still kept until 2005 involving the building of a hospital, a school, an airport, and parking.
Looking at the changes in more detail, both maps were divided two sides by the River Alanah from 1980 to 2005. In the north, most main trees surrounding the lake had been replaced by car parking and a park. Furthermore, there is one more extra sailing activity added in the lake. Next to the lake, a stadium and one more parking were built and a list of houses along the river was converted into the railway station and the Maria port.
In the south of the map, while there was also a railway station remained from 1980, the woodland had entirely been changed into a new warehouse and factories. In the right corner of the map in 2005, skyscrapers were built to replace houses and trees in 1980.
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss and give an opinion 78
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 61
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Maps 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49214659686 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38371161916 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2878435153 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215053923291 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102996221641 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931006727486 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161427574597 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629502923073 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.