Average cinema visits by age groups
The table displays the visitor number of presence and frequency while the graph represents the average of guest based on several ages in cinemas from 1994 to 2002. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance, it was evidents that the major percentage of present and amount was reached by people who went to movies in 1996 which was same with the highest average visitor in this time.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the data in the table. Around seven in ten attendance was gained by persons visiting its place in 1996 to 2002 while citizens coming in 1994 obtained more than three fifths. However, the upper frequency was attained by inhabitants that appear in movie theater during 1994 and 1996 whereas the other years achieved close to one in ten.
Turning to the chart data, the highest average was gotten by young-citizened people having 14-24 years old that had fluctuated line which stood at 12 and ended in 10 people whilst visitors involving the age around 35-49 years old were the lowest number that decreased sharply between 1996 and 1998 about 6 persons. In addition, the number starting from 9 and 10 was counted by citizens who had life consecutively more than 50 and 25-34 years old whereas ceased at the same point, it was 8 people in the last years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | Wulan | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievement and this sets a bad example for many young people 67
- The bar charts show different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the contruction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int, it was 8 people in the last years.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78414096916 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46175504961 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590308370044 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8813835865 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111722324327 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459055644209 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639084931715 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759671594739 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050635352183 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.