The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The given graphics demonstrates the transformation of the waterfront area located in Darwin town from 2009 to 2014
Overall, the whole landscape was altered with many new infrastructure errected, though, there were still some figures that still be kept unchanged over a 5-year period.
Remarkably, the industrial area, which was the main part of the location, was converted into a larger green space filled with a host of trees. Moreover, there added 3 more residential buildings, which was adjacent to the 3 old ones and to the west of them, a brand new university buiding was errected. Furthermore, a part of the industrial area was replaced by a swimming pool. Apart from those revonation, school, lake, convention center, fishing area and the 2 swimming pools was recorded with no alteration
In terms of access, on the right-hand side, there was a new harbour constructed on the seashore with a new footpath across the land of trees to the main road in the west of the map. Whild the footpath that encircles the center of the town was remained with no changes
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 42
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 2006 78
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports and activity Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, still, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91160220994 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81552295326 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0918925132 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108918589371 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582914867389 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470532052224 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095875784464 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108752061962 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.