The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25-year period from 1980 to 2005.
The maps elucidate the alterations which happened in Youngsville in New Zealand between 1980 and 2005. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the number of green areas which have been changes by several facilities in the town.
To begin with the south of the city, the existences of factories, skyscrapers and warehouse has replaced the position of several plants and houses in 1980. To the east of the skyscrapers, there was a new railway line which had been constructed in which it connected to the north of the town.
In accordance with the other alterations, the presence of new stadium and parking area, which were located in the north beside the new railway line, changed the place of several houses in previous time. 1980 to 2005, furthermore, witnessed a dramatic modification for the size of the green areas where it had been varied by a new park, and a new parking area in 2005. In contrast, the position of the airport, school, parking area, which were located in the south of the town, and hospital, which was placed in the north of the city, remained unchanged over the entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | vivitoben | 93 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | priyabhayani | 78 | view |
- Line graph : movie ticket sales by genre (1980 – 2010). 72
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok. 95
- Process : How Biogas is produced. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79695431472 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59275109023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207091905143 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108196549506 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849115222731 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143164937227 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692178140665 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.