The given pictures depict the development occurring in Youngsville in New Zealand between 1980 and 2005.
Overall, the area underwent several changes, the most significant of which is the disappearance of trees and houses to make way for industrial infrastructure, such as skyscrapers, factories, or railways.
To the north of River Alanan, a park and a parking lot to the south and the north of the lake respectively were built in 2005 at the expense of the green area. While there was an addition of recreational activities in the lake area, the hospital to the southwest of the lake remained unchanged. Houses along the coast were replaced by an extension of the railway line and the construction of a stadium and another parking area. Additionally, a marina was erected near the railway bridge.
Moving south, accommodation and woodland once again were transformed into factories and warehouses. Similarly, there was an erection of skyscrapers near the sea coast in place of residential and green areas that existed 25 years earlier. Moreover, schools, airports, and parking areas experienced no change in their positions throughout the period.
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Keeping Animals in Captivity is Cruel There is no Reason for Zoos to Exist in 21st Century How Far You Agree or Disagree with This Opinion 80
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand overa 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What solutions can you suggest 89
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08257113487 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2912812821 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118811384283 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497032133086 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754376888115 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902384851367 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941140159632 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08257113487 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2912812821 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118811384283 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497032133086 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754376888115 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902384851367 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941140159632 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.