The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The pictures above illustrate important changes which occurred in a village and then it built a hydroelectric power dam between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, from the map was considered huge changing that the small town became a new town within 20 years.
It was in 1990 that the river flowed from South to North, resulting in the creation of the village that was shortened in 2010. Along with an ancient structure and a woodland, the field toward of left river as well as farmland toward of right river was replaced to large fishing lake, followed with hydro electronic dam beneath lake. Aside from that, the villages that are located next to the right river are also important. The hotel was recently constructed.
Looking at the maps in more detail, mountains on both sides were explored to build an electricity dam and some of the villages were built in 2010. As a result, the mountains in the north remained unchanged.
- The pie chart illustrates the proportion of volunteers by organizations from 2008 to 2014
- The line graph compares the percentage of people living in four Asian counties in the world between 1970 and 2040
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...xplored to build an electricity dam and some of the villages were built in 2010. As a resul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, then, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83647798742 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50146905139 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1921308573 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153241914667 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059924206049 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778310142414 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11457444324 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753764485184 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.