The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The pictures illustrate a number of significant changes which took place in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
From the maps, it is clear that the most noticeable changes occurred in the town was of a huge lake. Additionally, by 2010, the forests had been entirely leased.
In 1990, there was an ancient structure with rare plants and animals to the west, and irrigated farmlands. However, with the construction of a reservoir, those features were explored beneath a large lake which became a lake in 2010. This reservoir provided much-needed water to the area, but it also caused the displacement of many local residents and the destruction of the ancient structure.
Looking at the map in more detail, the town looked completely different. The river was interrupted and electricity was constructed. A hotel was constructed towards the right of the lake, and the village was relocated towards the extreme south of the river bank.
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 78
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11392405063 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96794280701 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7474278855 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209785473487 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079939419189 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12926829566 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152156333265 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160135363361 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.