The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The given map illustrates how a coal mine turns into a tourism site.

It can be seen that the original coal mine had various sites. To the north of it was an entrance of the mine site; lunch rooms and changing rooms for staff were to the northwest and the two waste sites were situated in the east of the coal mine.

Significant changes occurred as a result of the mine’s transformation into a visitor attraction sites. Firstly, a number of buildings were repurposed. While the coal mine entrance became a visitor entrance, the dining rooms and the staff change rooms were transformed into a museum. The medical center also redeveloped to a café.

Secondly, the two waste sites were either completely overhauled, becoming a driving circuit and a pond. Both of these sites are in the east of the park.

Finally, a walking track was added between the driving circuit and the entrance. Moreover, a children’s playground was built in the southeast of the park.

Votes
Average: 4.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-24 Hendra 79 view
2019-03-18 KD Ho 46 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98311132344 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6815838793 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5454545455 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196908170855 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742133885826 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664192093694 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112334419478 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763323769595 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.