The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
The two maps depict the layout of the Norbiton industrial area at present and its arrangement in the future.
As illustrated, it can be seen that a number of significant changes will be introduced in the future. Noticeably, there will be a removal of all factories and several new buildings added in the places where factories are staying now, including the playground, school, and shops. In addition, it is remarkable that another roundabout will be constructed adjacent to the existing roundabout which is located in the center of the area. To the north, his new roundabout will have a path leading to a bridge across the river. There will be a medical center built between the two roundabouts. Instead of having one path from the center roundabout, there will be two more roads constructed. One will direct to the town and another will lead to the river. Whilst, the farmland next to the river will stay the same in the future.
Overall, there are various additional buildings to the industrial complex, which provides more options for people’s activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-15 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-16 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 67 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 78
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the stages involved in the process of making leather goods Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98876404494 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013459776 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7826773733 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559654243545 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261022325161 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414352959624 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651963211227 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550832785057 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.