The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps give information about how the Norbiton industral area changes from now to future.
In general, it can be clearly seen that the future plan will have more pubilc places than now, some of roads will be built. The factory area in there will be no more longer in the future.
On the one hand, the Farmland will be narrowed. There will be a long house locates near the river on the Northern side. There has a small roundabout in the South, instead of T-conjuction from now. In the small road connect 2 roundabouts. Shops and medical center will be built next to the road, from West to East respectfully. A short road will be widened next to the big roundabout in the North-West side. In this road, three new housing will be located here. There are also a new road going to built in the north, connected to the new housing in the Farmland.
On the other hand, the Eastern size of the map are gradually changing a lot. On the right road of the big roundabout. There has a playground next to the river, behind 2 housing on the road. A large housing will be replaced by the 2 sepreate housing. And a new school will be built in the end of the road.
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show the ground floor of a library in 2001 and how it was redeveloped in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the roads') or simply say ''some roads''.
Suggestion: some of the roads; some roads
... will have more pubilc places than now, some of roads will be built. The factory area in ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'longer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: longer
...t. The factory area in there will be no more longer in the future. On the one hand, the Fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'build'
Suggestion: build
...ere. There are also a new road going to built in the north, connected to the new hous...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3133640553 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35969000765 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8881210649 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.5 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.5625 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0422316506155 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0168553862311 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364621762266 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532009746691 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552790641878 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 13.2329268293 43% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.13 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.