The provided plans demonstrate the transformation of Pebbleton village between 20 years ago and the present.
Overall, the Pebble ton village has undergone radical changes with the most noticeable being the addition of recreational areas and accommodation to meet the increasing demand.
A quick glance at the first map reveals that there was a school and forests located in the south, surrounded by Coast Road. Crossing the Roadbridge on the cast of the map, turning left at the roundabout and following along the Old Fort Road passing a forest, there was a playing field erected to the left of the road. A bunch of houses were constructed to the opposite of the field, laying at the end of lighthouse lane. To the north-est of the map, there were a lighthouse and an old fort. And a film studio was built at the south west corner of the village.
Turning to other set of the picture, the school and forests in the south remain unchanged with Coast Road. Additionally, there is an old Roadbridge and a new footbridge which is extended to footpath in the middle of the map both connecting two peninsulas. Moreover, the roundabout with Old Fort Road passing many trees to constant playing field and lighthouse lane are all undergone a stabilizing trend. On the contrary, more houses are constructed along the coast with a new community centre and tennis courts next to. Eventually, Old fort and Film studio are replaced by the erection of children's playground and flats, respectively and the uncharged lighthouse at the north west corner of the map.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90151515152 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79239382413 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507575757576 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5028128394 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0622717211665 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275495833127 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453891484014 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570497635135 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065546943687 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.