The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

A glance at the provided maps illustrate the comparation of science park's layout in 2008 and today. In general, it is clearly apparent that some new facilities are built and the park now has less grassland.

Looking in more detail from the maps, now the park has several new facilities. A new building for research and development has been built at the west part of the park. Additionally, there are cycle path paved along the road and a bus stop near cyber security building. Regarding railway, a new station is now operated.

In spite of new facilities, some buildings have been changed for its function or its wide. The change in function has been employed on reception which is now turned to university hub and IT center that is now used as innovation center while the car park is now smaller than eight years ago. However, the cyber security now have been enlarged which eliminate the grassland at the southeast area of the park. Finally, the only facilities that remain unchanged are business units and office.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'paths'?
Suggestion: paths
...the park. Additionally, there are cycle path paved along the road and a bus stop nea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...railway, a new station is now operated. In spite of new facilities, some buildin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
... is now turned to university hub and IT center that is now used as innovation center w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, regarding, so, while, in general, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56445198784 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0816666292 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126557179822 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574886579835 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721144663891 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111983014257 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760793087596 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.