The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture makes differentiation of the structure of a science park between 2008 and the present time.
Overall, what stands out from the picture is that the present structure of the park has changed a lot, especially in the southeast and northwest part.
To begin, in 2008, in the northwest corner there was a grassland, while at the current time a research and development center is built. Next to it, the reception is replaced with the university hub and the office is in the same place. In addition, in the northeast corner cycle path is made alongside the road. Moreover, business units and the car park are in the right position but the space of the car park is reduced and shape like a square.
Furthermore, a cycle path is added with every road except the curve road in the east, what more, the station is removed and the IT center is turned into an innovation center. According to the past diagram, the cyber security center was in a square shape but at present, it is bigger than the previous and the shape is now like L. Between the innovation and cyber security center there is a path that connects the three places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
..., what more, the station is removed and the IT center is turned into an innovation cen...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...more, the station is removed and the IT center is turned into an innovation center. Ac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62068965517 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51126221531 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8752967697 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113658447004 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507695626259 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680809877177 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941014664136 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778358930087 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.