The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010.
The maps compare the changes in Stokeford village between 1930 and 2010.
Overall, the village of Stokeford situated along the banks of River Stoke was transformed completely from agricultural to mainly residential and with the improvement of road networks. It is also noticeable that the bridge over the river remains as it is.
In the northwestern side of the village, shops were demolished to give way for the new road and housing units. The primary school at the centre was extended by adding two buildings. Similarly, the large house was also extended but converted as a retirement home. In addition, its front garden was replaced by houses along the new road.
The farmland from the centre that extends to the south was totally removed for the development of more houses that surrounds the new ring road and housing units along the main road. In the northeastern side of the village, it can be seen that the three houses and the farmland were removed for the construction of a new road that gives access to the eight new houses. The bridge over the River Stoke remained undeveloped.
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 73
- The line graph below shows how much money was spent on cars in four different countries in Asia 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four modes of transport. 84
- In recent years, many small shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this positive or a negative statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idge over the river remains as it is. In the northwestern side of the village,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6244930799 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1609225875 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100835244993 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602897282696 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151246205685 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146263274834 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209986374909 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.