The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The pictures illustrate and compare changes taking place in Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016, a period of 6 years.
Overall, the university campus underwent considerable rearrangements including the merging of three science buildings together with the addition of a lecture theatre and cafe shop. It is also of note that the campus transformed to become more pedestrian and public-transit friendly as the road and car park are replaced with footpath and a bus station.
The library and admin buildings situate in the top-left and bottom-right hand corner of the campus retained their position. An IT Suite was added to the library in 2016. Three science buildings merged into one science building. Between the admin building and science building, a new lecture theatre was erected.
At the southwest corner of the campus, another larger car park was converted into a bus station over the six-year period. The reconstruction of the road into a system of footpath in 2016 allowed all buildings to be connected. Finally, there was the establishment of a cafe shop opposite the library.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pictures illustrate and compare chan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'An' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: An; IT
... of the campus retained their position. An IT Suite was added to the library in 2016....
^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all buildings to be connected. Finally, there was the establishment of a cafe sh...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25842696629 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91596305711 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2320482975 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833262029994 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368036171018 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752319316957 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770633541776 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103565849993 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.