The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The pictures illustrate and compare changes taking place in Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016, a period of 6 years.
Overall, the university campus underwent considerable rearrangements including the merging of three science buildings together with the addition of a lecture theatre and cafe shop. It is also of note that the campus transformed to become more pedestrian and public-transit friendly as the road and car park are replaced with footpath and a bus station.
The library and admin buildings situated in the top-left and bottom-right hand corner of the campus retained their position in which an IT Suite was added to the former in 2016. Between the admin building and science block which was formed as a result of the merging of three separate science buildings, a new lecture theatre was erected where the car park once stood.
At the southwest corner of the campus, another larger car park was converted into a bus station over the six-year period. The reconstruction of the road into a system of footpath in 2016 allowed all buildings to be connected and made way for the establishment of a cafe shop across from the library.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-03-21 susudoantrinh 56 view
2020-03-21 susudoantrinh 78 view
Essays by user susudoantrinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pictures illustrate and compare chan...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...campus retained their position in which an IT Suite was added to the former in 2016. ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, as for, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01546391753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82374973156 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.7538396467 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104050354667 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548923849105 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839804066857 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857038535589 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988131983313 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.