The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depict modifications to an unspecified office building from the present day to the future. Overall, the office building underwent a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replaced or added.
Between today and the forthcoming period, the entrance on the right side at the front will be moved to the center so that people can easily access the building. In addition, the four small buildings at the front will be split into two larger offices on both sides of the new entrance. At the back, the kitchen and canteen will be converted into offices, while the storeroom still retained its spot.
Another major change to the area was the removal of the lawns on both sides of the place. According to the plan, the current grass area on the right of the building will be demolished to make rooms for a meeting area with two rows of seats. A coffee machine and toilets will be sited in the newly extended part to serve people's needs. Finally, on the left side of the building, the grass area will be replaced with an outdoor seating area with chairs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000 73
- The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room 79
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 84
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 61
- The table shows the export values of various products in 1997 and 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74468085106 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46854361112 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.85758377 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110125128734 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541208683337 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606624221885 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918689146382 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648403781558 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.