The maps show the development of Happy Valley Shopping Center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The maps indicate the Happy Valley Shopping center in 1982 and 2012. Overall, since this area was expanded, some trees and lake were omitted.
In 1982 a coffeeshop was located on the north-western of map, where was eliminated in 2012. Lobby area and pathway located on the west side of shopping mall, had the same condotion. In addition to omitting these areas, lake was charged to furniture retailer and added to shopping center as a main part in 2012.
Some areas were added in 2012, in comparison with 1982. First and foremost, parking was launched in the southwest of mall as a separate state which had a way to entrance. Themed restaurant was an interesting place that was built in the east of entertainment area, where was in the centre of the shopping mall in both 1982 and 2012. Moreover, four elevators were in the same place in south part between toilet and food store in 2012 which went to second floor. Some toilets were in the west-south of both maps, next to the elevators.
Food stores, sport store and electric store were relocated in 2012. Food store was in the north of indoor space in 1982; however, was changed to east-south, near the elevators, in 2012. Furthermore, sport store and electric store were in the east and east-south of entertainment area respectively in 1982. These store were relocated to the north of shopping center in 2012.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77215189873 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57034417134 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472573839662 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1753379502 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7857142857 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811258621669 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428896364996 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641657746787 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742516025029 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494554200127 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77215189873 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57034417134 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472573839662 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1753379502 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7857142857 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811258621669 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428896364996 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641657746787 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742516025029 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494554200127 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.