The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future
The given figures illustrate the process of turning the industrial zone into an area used for accommodations on the following day.
By comparing the design in the recent day and the proposed plan of the area, certain alterations are noteworthy. From an overall perspective, it is apparent that household shelter will make way for enterprises and offices.
According to the data on the map in the present day, it is obvious that the packing station and storage room are located to the west of the zone while the factory is situated in the opposed direction. Subsequently, in the center of the figure, there are 6 offices for the employees to work in it and a canteen which is big as double as the office size and surrounded by three offices. Following that, to the north of the image, which is above these offices is the entrance door and reception service.
Moving to the proposed plan, it is noticeable that most places in this area will be covered by houses. The packing and storage zone will be supplanted by 3 bedrooms house and 4 bedrooms house respectively. These previous offices and canteen will be replaced by a parking garage. Moreover, instead of the existence of the entrance and reception service, there are new 3 houses which have two bedrooms in each and communal will be added in this sphere. Finally, to the east of the map, the new advent of the parking area and apartments for residents will take the position of the factory at the present day whereas there is no expansion of the whole area and road will still remain its name over the change.
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69202898551 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61842739937 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514492753623 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6798792312 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243468446808 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850814008459 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659679495187 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133164921991 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821320940276 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.