The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.
The picture illustrates the development of Liverpool John Moores University in the 6-year period from 2010.
Overall, we can see that there were appearances of amenities such as Café, bus station and lecture theatre while the library and admin building saw no difference over time.
Firstly, the road was knocked down to make way for a footpath. In 2010, there were three buildings namely Biology, Chemistry and Physics to the northeast of the footpath but after six years, these buildings were demolished and were replaced by Science. By contrast, in the northwest area of the path, there was no change with the library.
Secondly, the disappearances of two car parks made way for the constructions of a café, bus station and lecture theatre located at the southeast and the east respectively. Furthermore, there was a construction of IT Suite which was next to the library. On the other hand, admin building which was across the lecture theatre, remained stable over 6 years
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 75
- Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important! 56
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0987654321 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80640936905 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1302503787 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 5.23603664747 222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116066942953 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061434477007 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130895161784 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113011485101 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169076005662 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.