The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.
The maps illustrate the alterations of Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the replacement of the road into footpath.
To begin with the north side of the university, biology, chemistry and physics building was converted into science building in 2016. To the west of the new science building, library and IT suite had been constructed and changed the position of the library in 2010, and to the south of new science building, 2010 to 2016 witnessed the alterations of car park and the road position which had been replaced by new lecture theatre.
In accordance with the south part of the university, admin building was moved to the south of new lecture theatre. Furthermore, the existence of new footpaths changed the position of admin building and the road in 2010 as well as the new bus station and new café had been build in the opposite of admin building and lecture theatre respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | alifdores | 73 | view |
- International travel is becoming cheaper and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 54
- 'The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main. 73
- MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number 73
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 73
- The chart shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94047619048 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71028840999 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8445834179 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194193708755 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130360945272 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186146776592 0.0843802449381 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173505502589 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146361612869 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.