The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period

Essay topics:

The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

The line graphs illustrate the average amount of money that parents invested in children’s sports every month, and the quantity of kids taking part in three types of sport activities from year 2008 to 2014.
In general, the parents spent much more money on children’s sport activities over the period of 6 years. It is clear that there were more children participated in sports, with the highest number of those took part in football over entire these years..
To commence with, in 2008, parents spents average 20 pounds per month on outdoor activities of their children. This figure witnessed a considerable increase over the six-year period, and reached a high of more than 30 pounds in 2014.
Regarding the number of children took part in three different activities. in 2008, only approximately 1 millions children took part in athletics, while this figure for football was more than 7.5 millions, ranked at the first place. From 2008 to 2010, the number of children participated in these two sports remained unchange before athletics rose dramatically and finished at about 5 millions. Swimming saw an upward trend in participation of children; however, stood at the bottom of the list in 2014 at around 4 millions.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-18 Phuong1810 89 view
2023-07-22 Mei1312 84 view
2023-01-31 my220904 78 view
2022-11-15 khangoccho 84 view
2022-09-13 felixchen view
Essays by user Phuong1810 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...part in football over entire these years.. To commence with, in 2008, parents sp...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en. This figure witnessed a considerable increase over the six-year period, and r...
^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ook part in three different activities. in 2008, only approximately 1 millions chi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08415841584 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73644183392 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60396039604 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6659932598 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332329299978 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148757962763 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685872543908 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206128745235 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326509408085 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.