money spent on books in 4 countries
The presented line chart illustrates the number of money which people paid out for books in 4 countries, namely Germany, France, Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005.
In general, money spent on books increased year by year in different countries but Australia was the country having a sharp rise in its number.
Firstly, in 1995, German paid out 80 millions dolars for buying books, more than 30 millions Italian. From 1995 to 1999, the number of money spent on books in Garmany grew slightly to 90 millions dollars in 1999 while this figure in Italy declined to under 50 millions after witnessing a small climb in 1997, at approximately 60 millions dollars. In the last six years, Italian used more and more money for books and this number in 2005 was above 60 millions. Meanwhile, before leaping to a new peak in 2005, at nearly 100 millions dollars, money spent on books in Germany fall smally to under 90 millions.
In other countries, French paid out 55 millions dollars in 1995 for books, followed by Australian, at 50 millions. In the period from 1995 to 1999, there was a slight increase in the number of money spent on books in France and Austria, at 60 millions and 40 millions respectively. Untill 2001, this figure in Austria stayed constant, whereas one in France jumped to nearly 70 millions dollars. Though, between 2001 and 2005, both of which reached at peak nearly 70 millions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | view | |
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with thís opinion? 87
- The average temperatures 78
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in differents years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit down restaurants. 56
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999. 84
- the charts below show the percentage of the food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The grap shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sitdown restaurants. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79012345679 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46178604333 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514403292181 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5543488338 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287652391712 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12856922994 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130800684891 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21570760088 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126992132564 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.