Money spent in thousands of dollars on facilities at a school
The bar chart illustrates how much money spent on three different facilities(Technology, Sport and Building) at Cedar Trees School, over a decade between 2000 and 2010. Units are measured in thousands of dollars.
Overall, it can be seen that Technology paid out more money for five years between 2005 and 2010 whereas the least amount of money spent Sport facility in 2010. Furthermore, the most significant difference amongst all three facilities was between Technology and Sport in 2010.
In terms of Technology facility, the school spent the highest amount of money in 2005 and 2010 years(Approximately $3500) and the second highest amount of money spent on Building in the same years as opposed to it in 2000. Likewise, It gradually increased from $2500 to $3000.
On the other hand, the lowest expenditures spent on Technology in 2000(Around $3000). Similarly, the amount of money paid out on Building was the least in 2000(Approximately $2000). Neither of the sport facilities was spent much which accounted for under $2000 of expenditures over a decade. There was a slight decrease for Sport from 2000 to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | view | |
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spent much which accounted for under 000 of expenditures over a decade. There was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, second, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09191793665 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.442722195 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275438467156 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10094519931 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736276287313 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176724503702 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496680058224 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.