the number of visitors to England
The given line graph illustrates the number of tourists to England who visited four different famous places in Brighton.
It can be clearly seen from the graph that the percentage of tourists visiting Pavilion and Art Gallery changed significantly from 1980 to 2010. Whereas, that of tourists coming to Pier and Festival were more stable.
The amount of tourists coming to Art Gallery and Pavilion even climbed dramatically and then dropped ( about 10% and 30% respectively). The figures of tourists coming to Art Gallery, Pavillion and Pier all increased in 1985, while that of the remaining group went down marginally. Specially in 1985, the percentage of tourists who visited Art Gallery reached a peak (below 40%) and in 1995, that of tourist going to Pavilion touched the highest point ( almost 50%).
In contrast, the percentage of people who visited Festival was not change too much. From 1980 to 2000, the number of tourists arriving to Festival decrease slightly, whereas that of tourists coming to Pier waved. The figures of tourists going to Festival maintained the same rate over a period of 10 years between 2000 and 2010 (nearly 30%), while that of people visiting Pier went up ( from approximately 10% to over 20%) and that of tourists arriving to Pavilion and Art Gallery declined.
- Japanese average monthly salary 67
- the number of visitors to England 11
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.All education (primary, secondary and further education) should be free to all people and paid and managed by the government.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- lie 56
- the world population 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en climbed dramatically and then dropped about 10% and 30% respectively. The figu...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to Pavilion touched the highest point almost 50%. In contrast, the percentag...
^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile that of people visiting Pier went up from approximately 10% to over 20% and t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02803738318 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59220732665 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6732087529 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525185401192 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310067166682 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641939373953 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578665780512 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819779874325 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.