The percentage of 3 types of crimes: car theft, house burglary & street robbery in England & Wales from 1970 to 2015
The line graph gives information about the percentage of three different types of crime in two countries over the course of 30 years starting from 1970.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the rate of car theft and house burglary experienced an increase while the percentage of street robbery remained fairly unchanged.
In 1970, the proportion of car theft was the highest occupying exactly 0.4%, slightly taller than that of house burglary, at approximately 0.3%. Only in 15 years, Car theft rates witnessed a growth like a rocket and it reached a peak at 1.4 in 1995. Meanwhile, the figures for house burglary gradually went up at just under 0.4% in the initial 10 years before climbing to at 0.6% in the sequent ten years. There were significantly fall to 0.8% and 0.4% in the data for car theft and house burglary, respectively.
The number of street robberies was 0.1% in 1970, during 30 years the figures for this kind of crime stayed practically no change, fluctuating between around 0.1% to 0.18%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 44 | view |
- Some teachers think that international student exchange programs would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 95
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997to 2010. 84
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89142857143 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67637281195 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9591538805 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261029576179 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117917782757 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542206337458 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148236442714 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529793337488 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.