Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals,home cooking, fast food vs.sit-down restaurant.
The given circular chart and linear graph depict the information about the food budget spent on restaurant food and home cooking whereas the number of meals for fast food and sit-down restaurant during the years 1970 to 2000. It is calibrated in percentum and numbers which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall , it is evident that in the last year restaurant meals was exactly half while number of fast food reached at peak level.
It can be seen that in the year 1970 the people spent on restaurant meals had only 10 % whereas 90% was on home cooking.In addition to this , it had been 5% increased in 1980 while 75% expenditure on house cooking. Furthermore , in the trend of 1990, 65% more as compare to home cooking. After that in the year 2000, both were equally half.
As far as trend was concerned , in the case of fast food and sit-down restaurant both had been 20 numbers. Moreover, in the year 1980, fast food had 28 while sit-down restaurant was 35 numbers. Besides , the fast food drastic increased which was above 50 numbers as well as sit-down restaurant decreased approximately 10 % in 1990. Furthermore, in 2000 , fast food reached at peak level whilst sit-down restaurant almost same.
- Nowadays people throw many old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throw away society outweigh any possible economic advantages ? 84
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals,home cooking, fast food vs.sit-down restaurant. 73
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y and coherently represented. Overall , it is evident that in the last year res...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ly 10 % whereas 90% was on home cooking.In addition to this , it had been 5% incre...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was on home cooking.In addition to this , it had been 5% increased in 1980 while ...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xpenditure on house cooking. Furthermore , in the trend of 1990, 65% more as compa...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ermore , in the trend of 1990, 65% more as compare to home cooking. After that in ...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y half. As far as trend was concerned , in the case of fast food and sit-down r...
^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...-down restaurant was 35 numbers. Besides , the fast food drastic increased which w...
^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ately 10 % in 1990. Furthermore, in 2000 , fast food reached at peak level whilst ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, moreover, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86473429952 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61856747464 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526570048309 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0690475676 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.7 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380492336139 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165083934196 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121222055133 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232738193474 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116865130211 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.