The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.

The given three circular chart reveal the information about changes in annual expenditure of five different amounts for a UK school in year :1981,1991,2001. The data is calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherent represented.

Overall, it is evident that in all years teachers salaries and insurance was gradually increasing , while other workers salary decreased and rest to fluctuated.

It can be seen that the highest school expenditure on teacher salaries that was 50% in year 1891 as compare to 1981. In addition to this , on furniture and equipment spending had 10% more in the year 1981as comparison in 1991. Moreover , insurance, other workers salary and resources were 2% ,28%and 15% in the year 1981 whereas it had been 3%, 22% and 20% in the year 1991 respectively.

As far as trend was concerned in the year 2001, the total expenditure on insurance and resources were under tenth. Apart from all this teacher salaries had been less than 50% . Furthermore , the other workers salary was a small minority whereas furniture and equipment was 23% only.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-12 Miss Zune 78 view
2019-08-29 Jonkun 67 view
2019-06-24 dilipkarki 67 view
2019-01-12 trangh16688 73 view
2018-06-28 Manpreetgill 73 view
Essays by user Diljot :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The given three circular chart reveal the information about changes in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s and insurance was gradually increasing , while other workers salary decreased an...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... was gradually increasing , while other workers salary decreased and rest to fluctuated...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... as compare to 1981. In addition to this , on furniture and equipment spending had...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...year 1981as comparison in 1991. Moreover , insurance, other workers salary and res...
^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...on in 1991. Moreover , insurance, other workers salary and resources were 2% ,28%and 15...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...her workers salary and resources were 2% ,28%and 15% in the year 1981 whereas it h...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... teacher salaries had been less than 50% . Furthermore , the other workers salary ...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ies had been less than 50% . Furthermore , the other workers salary was a small mi...
^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...less than 50% . Furthermore , the other workers salary was a small minority whereas fur...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11931818182 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86357380617 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4829973436 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164296401155 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708633336865 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112105794803 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111000909333 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122700746389 0.0819641961636 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.