The two bar charts compare the percentage of people born in and outside Australia that reside in cities, towns, and rural areas in 1995 and 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, it can be observed that most people (Australian-born and non-Australian-born) live in cities in 1995 and this figure still remained the same in 2010. Meanwhile, the number of residents (Australian-born and non-Australian-born) in the two remained areas decreased significantly during the given time period.
Beginning with the 1995 bar chart, it can be easily observed that cities had the highest population of native and non-native Australian, at 50% and 60% respectively. The proportion of Australian citizens who lived in towns was 20%, while the figure for those non-native Australian who resided in towns was only 10%. About 30% of citizens born in Australia stayed in rural areas and 40% of outsiders lived in those places.
Turning to the second bar chart, we can see that the gaps between the number of people (born in and outside Australia) who lived in cities and remained areas are very large. More than 60% of people born in Australia lived in cities, which was around 47% higher than those who lived in towns and rural areas. Moreover, up to 80% of people born outside Australia lived in big cities, while the rates of the non-Austrlain population who lived in towns and rural areas were less than 10%.
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 73
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99572649573 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92957055995 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9497572542 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359940553246 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178938905655 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875017906757 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238161635209 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877510255273 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.