The percentage of school children learning to play different musical instrument in 2005, 2010, 2015
The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who learned to play four musical instruments over three different years; 2005, 2010 and 2015.
Overall, more students learned the instruments in the study in 2015 than in previous years, with the exception of the violin. Furthermore, guitar and piano remained the most popular instruments to learn in all the years surveyed.
In 2005, about 11% of students learned to play the guitar, piano and violin, while only 5% of students learned to play the drums. By 2010, the popularity of guitars and pianos had nearly doubled, with between 20% and 18% of students learning to play them. In the same year, the percentage of students learning to play the drums remained the same, while the percentage of students learning the violin decreased slightly.
In 2015, the percentage of students taking guitar lessons increased by about 10%, while the percentage of students taking piano lessons more than doubled, reaching about 40%. Furthermore, although the percentage of children learning drums increased slightly to 8%, the figures for violin decreased moderately, at only 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | nghiadtIELTS | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-05 | Mina__ | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | nguyentru1993 | 59 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...e study in 2015 than in previous years, with the exception of the violin. Furthermore, guitar and pia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25966850829 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61633566178 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486187845304 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4676355242 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373181294419 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182166670866 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113084842226 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256560628425 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125981148176 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.