The line graph below figures the household recycling rates in three european coutries: United Kingdom, France and Germany between 2005 and 2015. The units are measured in percents.
Between 2005 and 2015, the UK's and Germany's recycling rates considerably increased. In the UK from 35% to approximately 57% and in Germany from 20% to approximately 61%. In contrast, France had a big decrease between 2005 and 2013, but the next 2 years it increased from 30% to 40%. It represent the middle of the graph.
In the period 2007-2009, the household recycling rates in the UK had a constant (40%).
Overall, the highest point represent more than 60% in the UK in 2015 period. The lowest point is at he approximately 20% in Germany in the 2005.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Jason Pappachan
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have a part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below figures the household recycling r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'represents'?
Suggestion: represents
... years it increased from 30% to 40%. It represent the middle of the graph. In the perio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 611.0 965.302439024 63% => OK
No of words: 127.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81102362205 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35699682299 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75925555666 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 169.2 283.868780488 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0208265561 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8888888889 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1111111111 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227601561481 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971685569777 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10742035144 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145831136906 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878762555879 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.