Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amounts of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010
The bar graph illustrates the number of fruits and vegetables consumed by three particular British genders and ages for 8 years from 2002 to 2010.
In general, the percentage of fruits and vegetables of both three groups had an upward trend at the first stage but finally slightly down from 2010. Kids consumed the lowest amounts of green products among men and women.
In 2002, 25% of the amounts of fruit and vegetables are consumed by women which was 3% more than men. Children ate the suggested diet lower than other groups, at over 10%. There is a significant change in 2006, the proportion of fruit and vegetables consumed by males increased from 22% to 26%. Female consumers accounted for 14% higher than kids at eating products, at 32% and 18% respectively.
From 2006 to 2010, there was a downward trend in both ages and genders. The percentage of both British males and kids who consumed daily suggested diet slightly decreased to 2%, at 24% and 16% respectively. Women still kept leading the consumption percentage rate in 2010 despite it reduced by 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- The increase of production of consumer goods damages the natural environment Why is this the case What can be done to reduce it 84
- making wool
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, still, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84699453552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59351654092 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2123261655 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337159508316 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129947862699 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736966934667 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203698013061 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.008596115924 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.